Excellent video from Americans for Peace and Tolerance....
Excellent video from Americans for Peace and Tolerance....
March 24, 2010 | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
This panel discussion promises to be lively and informative, although the majority of the sponsors no doubt do not support the Fusion Centers.
“Fusion Centers and Homeland Security Directives”
When: Thursday, March 25th, 2010 from 6:00 pm to 8:30 pm
Location: Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center (ISBCC), 100 Malcolm X Boulevard, Roxbury, MA 02120 (Main Hall, First Floor).
Sponsors: Muslim American Society of Boston (MAS Boston), Dept. of Homeland Security, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Arab-American Institute, Bill of Rights Defense Committee (BORDC)
Speakers:
Mike German (Policy Counsel, Washington Legislative Office, American Civil Liberties Union ACLU). Mike German is a sixteen-year veteran of the FBI, where he served as a Special Agent in domestic terrorism, bank fraud and public corruption investigations. While at the FBI, German also served in undercover operations, successfully helping to prevent several terrorist attacks. He resigned in 2004 to make Congress and the public aware of the continuing deficiencies in FBI counterterrorism operations after the implementation of the 9/11 Commission’s reforms.
Carol Rose is the Executive Director of the ACLU of Massachusetts. A lawyer and journalist, Carol has spent her career advocating for human rights and civil liberties both in the United States and abroad, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nepal, Japan, Sri Lanka, Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, Northern Ireland, and Vietnam.
David Gersten (Acting Deputy Officer for Programs and Compliance, Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, US Department of Homeland Security) David Gersten normally holds the position of Director of the Programs Division for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties. Before joining DHS, Mr. Gersten led customer service efforts for the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. Prior to his work at the Department of Education, he served as executive director of the Center for Equal Opportunity providing assistance and scrutiny for the public and private sector on immigration and assimilation policy making. Mr. Gersten also spent four years as director of education for an educational foundation dedicated to identifying, training and placing young people in public policy positions. He is the proud parent of five children including six year old triplets.
Juliette Kayyem (Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental Affairs, US Department of Homeland Security) Juliette N. Kayyem was appointed as Massachusetts’ first Undersecretary for Homeland Security by Gov. Deval L. Patrick in January 2007. When appointed by Governor Patrick, she became the first Arab-American to serve as a homeland security advisor at the state level. As undersecretary, she has been responsible for developing statewide policy on homeland security and specifically focused on preventing, protecting, responding to, and recovering from any and all critical incidents. Undersecretary Kayyem focused much of her time on coordinating efforts across local, state and federal entities.
Continue reading ""Fusion Centers and Homeland Security Centers" March 25, 2010" »
March 11, 2010 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
UPDATE: You can see a video of the press conferencehere.
This sounds extremely interesting.....I hope our local media and politicians pay attention to who's in charge at the Islamic Society of Boston. This deserves attention, scrutiny and action from our leaders. From Americans for Peace and Tolerance:
WHAT: Press Conference to Caution about Extremist Leadership of the Boston Islamic Center. WHEN: Thursday, June 25th, 10:30 AM WHERE: Sheraton Crowne Plaza Hotel, Newton, 320 Washington Street, Newton MA 02158
Continue reading "Press Conference Thursday - Extremist Leadership at Roxbury Mosque" »
June 24, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
OK, just kidding! Actually, MEMRI reports that a broad spectrum of Scandinavian Muslim leaders criticized Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi, spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, for his recent statement on Al-Jazeera TV about the Holocaust:
"In response to MEMRI TV's February 1, 2009 release of a translated and subtitled clip capturing prominent Sunni sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi on Al-Jazeera TV in January 2009 calling the Holocaust "divine punishment" for the Jews and warning that "Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers [i.e. Muslims]," and also saying that he would "shoot Allah's enemies, the Jews," it was reported that Muslim Imams and Islamic groups in Scandinavia have distanced themselves from the remarks and are questioning association with Al-Qaradhawi."
"....On February 16, the Norwegian newspapers Dagbladet and Aftenpost reported that the Islamic Council of Norway had, on that same date, denounced Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi's statements on Al-Jazeera TV as "unacceptable." According to the German news agency Deutsche Presse-Agentur (DPE), Aftenposten quoted Islamic Council of Norway head Senaid Kobilica as saying that the council also planned to raise the matter with the European Council for Fatwa and Research, which Al-Qaradhawi heads."
MEMRI has numerous quotes from Norwegian, Danish and Swedish Muslim council leaders and imams who strongly criticized Qaradawi's statements. We haven't heard anything similar from Massachusetts Muslim leaders and imams, have we? Imagine Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) imam Basyouny Nehela or Muslim American Society (MAS) director Bilal Kaleem saying something like "It's unacceptable that Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi honors the Holocaust, we strongly reject that"? I'm guessing that'll never happen, but I'd love to be proven wrong.
Meanwhile, our local ISB/MAS is busy giving dawah training from the Islamic American University, an Ohio-based "online" university that has Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi as its chairman.
March 13, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Islamic American University and MAS Boston present: The Quranic Methodology for Da'wa and Thought by Sh. Basyouny Nehela.
The course is tentatively targeted to begin on March 18th 2009, for twelve weeks on Wednesday evenings, 6:30-8:00PM.
The mind reels at who the founder,chairman and vice-chairman are of the Islamic American University. Solomonia did the research:
Continue reading "Muslim Brotherhood Dawah Course Coming to Boston " »
March 09, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
From the Buffalo News:
Aasiya Hassan had recently filed for divorce. (Photo of Muzzammil Hassan and his wife Aasiya from Buffalo News.)
Wow. As Robert Spencer says, "...now that he has beheaded his wife, I'm afraid this prominent
moderate Muslim will only be feeding those negative perceptions." Daniel Pipes followed NY-based Bridges after its launch and has a listing of articles about it here. A New York Sun article from 2006 wrote about the Bridges network programming, noting that the station presented a variety of Muslim community leaders and scholars.
Continue reading "Head of Bridges TV Beheads His Wife in Buffalo NY" »
February 14, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) and the Muslim American Society are holding a fundraiser dinner on Saturday, January 17 at the ISB Cultural Center (aka the Roxbury mosque). The ISB/MAS co-organized several anti-Israel protests around Boston last week, aligning itself with radical Marxist organizations such as A.N.S.W.E.R. This weekend, it's a fundraising dinner for Gaza sponsored by the Islamic Relief USA. More info here. The speakers include Abed Ayoub and Yousef Abdullah, CEO and Operations Manager, respectively, of Islamic Relief.
So is the ISB raising money for Hamas?
Boston's own Citizens for Peace and Tolerance issued a press release earlier this week that examined the links between the Islamic Relief Worldwide and Hamas and with the Muslim Brotherhood:
Dennis Hale, President of the Boston based Citizens for Peace and Tolerance (CPT) - an
interfaith group of Christians, Muslims and Jews - warned today that an
upcoming Muslim American Society of Boston (MAS Boston) fundraising event advertised to donors
as humanitarian aid to Gaza
may instead channel funds to the terror group, Hamas.
"The January 17th fundraiser
is collecting money for the Gaza
operations of Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW), a group previously accused of
transferring funds to Hamas," Hale said.
Hamas is an Islamic supremacist organization that belongs to
the Palestine
branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood is considered to be
the origin for most of the modern jihad movements. Hamas is dedicated to the
destruction of the Jewish state and uses terrorism and murder to achieve its
goals. It is an openly genocidal organization that has explicitly and
continuously called for the murder of all Jews worldwide. The founding charter of
Hamas proclaims that peace will come to Earth only when all the Jews are killed:
"Virtually the entire civilized world, from Barack Obama to
the government of Egypt,
agrees that Hamas's refusal to recognize Israel's
right to exist and renounce terrorism against Israeli civilians is the root
cause of the horrible violence in Gaza and Israel,"
said Hale. "For the Muslim American
Society to raise funds for a Hamas-linked charity in the heart of Boston is an affront to
the traditions of liberty and tolerance on which this city was built. "
Continue reading "Roxbury Mosque Raises Funds for Gaza - or Hamas?" »
January 17, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
The tide is changing in Boston, and I just love the smell of the salty sea air.
The left-of-liberal Boston Phoenix is calling for an investigation into the Boston Redevelopment Authority transfer of city land to the Islamic Society of Boston. This op-ed follows the in-depth article from two weeks ago on "Menino's Mosque." From today's op-ed:
"Whatever one thinks of the favorable deal the city struck with the mosque, there remains a question as to whether this is the best way for the city to conduct itself. That is why the Phoenix joins in calling for the independent Boston Municipal Research Bureau to examine the mosque deal and offer its opinion on whether this is the way the city should be conducting its development business."
"Meanwhile, the City Council should look into whether the playgrounds by the mosque are being properly maintained; the attorney general should review whether the public's business was properly transacted; and the secretary of state should seek changes in the law governing public documents, so that in the future, getting answers to questions such as these might be possible."
Them's fightin' words.
The Mayor and the City Council were negligent in their fiduciary duties, and we now have a Muslim Brotherhood front organization running the largest mosque in New England under our noses. With the taxpayers' assistance. It's not too late! I applaud the Phoenix for this strong call for an investigation.
December 11, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Dennis Hale of the Citizens for Peace and Tolerance finds many connections between the recent Holy Land Foundation trial in Texas and our fair city. From Market Watch:
Continue reading "Citizens for Peace and Tolerance Finds ISB Locals Ties in HLF Trial" »
December 03, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Charles Jacobs writes a follow-up op-ed for the Jewish Advocate on Boston Mayor Menino's mosque, published last week in the Boston Phoenix. Solomonia has the full text here. Excerpts:
"The Phoenix report is the first public account of how a well intentioned Mayor tried to help local African-American Muslims in Roxbury build a mosque, but wound up subsidizing what many in Boston worry is a Saudi-funded and controlled center with connections to radical Islam --- a mile from downtown."
"Phoenix reporter David Bernstein sketches a complex tale of good intentions gone awry. At the center of Bernstein's account is Muhammad Ali-Salaam, who played a double role: as promoter and fundraiser for the mosque, while being paid as a city official to guard Boston's interests."
Miss Kelly thought the very same thing...where's the conflict of interest investigation?? More from Jacobs:
Continue reading "Menino's Mosque - Where's the FinComm Investigation of the BRA?" »
December 01, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Excellent investigative article in the Boston Phoenix, available on the web today, to be printed tomorrow. Reporter David Bernstein covers a lot of ground here, going back to 1988 and the very beginning of the mosque project, which was initiated by a council of Roxbury Muslims. This article is terrific, he covers all the salient issues:
Great article, lots of material, much of it new. Also excellent sidebars. Excerpts:
"It is the involvement of city officials — backed by the strong support of Menino and the now scandal-tinged state senator Dianne Wilkerson — that distinguishes this project from the many churches, synagogues, mosques, and other facilities that are built and expanded all the time."
I'm disappointed that ISB/MAS imam (sheikh?) Basyouny Nehela wan't even mentioned in the article. He once again manages to escape any scrutiny. How did he get here? Who brought him here from Egypt? Given all the seaminess with these folks, Nehela has to have something going on. Also no mention of the ISB's latest trustee, Dr. Jamal Badawi, who was personally named in the US Muslim Brotherhood's 1991 planning document. Remember this charming quote from that document:
“The Ikhwan (Muslim Brothers) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
For even the liberal Boston Phoenix to sit up and pay close attention to the ISB/MAS and the City's role in the mosque project is news in itself. Good job, Boston Phoenix!
November 20, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Boston Globe published a soft, pleasant article about the Roxbury mosque, entitled "Making peace and prayers, Mosque opens its doors as controversy fades." The controversy fades for the Globe maybe, but not for other folks. I'm happy for Muslims that they have an attractive mosque in which to pray. I'm not happy that the Muslim American Society is in charge or that the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) has the exact same troublesome trustees that they had before: Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi is still a proposed trustee (he supports suicide bombing and death for homomsexuals and apostates); Jamal Badawi (some equally hairy ideology from the soft-spoken Dr. Badawi) ; and Dr. Walid Fitaihi, he of "the Jews are the scourge of the earth" fame.
Fitahi resigned as an ISB trustee days before he was to be subject to interrogatories in the ISB lawsuit. Shortly after the lawsuit was withdrawn, Fitaihi was reinstated as a trustee. Even the Boston Gobe wrote an editorial back in 2004 calling for the ISB to "distance themselves" from Fitaihi. They've done the opposite.
Badawi has the distinction of being personally named in the US Muslim Brotherhood's 1991 planning document, Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal of the Group in North America, from which we read this memorable quote:
“The Ikhwan (Muslim Brothers) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
The Dr. Jamal Badawi Foundation is listed in the 1991 master plan, along with Islamic Society of North American (ISNA), as "providing the seed of the comprehensive dawa organization." The document details the plan to establish an array of interlinked Islamic organizations, so that Muslims can create their own society within the larger U.S. society. And the Muslim American Society (daughter organization of the US Muslim Brotherhood) is doing just that.
There were a few amusing misstatements in Boston Globe article, including this one:
"Determining the size of the Muslim population is an inexact science. The Muslim American Society estimates that about 120,000 Muslims live in Massachusetts; a recent survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found the population to be less than 32,000."
Muslim organizations have a penchant for exaggerating their numbers, perhaps as a way to appear to wield more political power than they actually do. CAIR is notorious for making outlandish claims about the size of the US Muslim population. The MAS is doing the same thing. Recently, MAS director Bilal Kaleen claimed that " there are more than 120,000 Muslims in Massachusetts," which would mean that almost 2% of the state's population is Muslim. I doubt that very much. Other Muslim sources indicate a population of roughly 24,000. As reporter Paulson points out, The Pew Forum survey says 32,000. So the MAS is at least quadrupling the number of Muslims here. Anyone surprised by that?
More unintended funniness in the Globe article:
"The mosque has been controversial for years. A conservative Israel-advocacy organization called the David Project asserted that some of the mosque's founding leaders had links to terrorism. In 2005, the Islamic Society filed a lawsuit against the David Project and two media outlets, saying that those allegations were defamatory, but dropped the suit last year after another suit, challenging the mosque's construction, was also dropped."
Oopsy, forgot about the other fourteen defendants that the ISB sued, including a Muslim, Sheik Ahmed Mansour. Can't be defamation if it's true.
The paper quotes Najiba Akbar, "who is the Muslim chaplain at Wellesley College." My sources were correct, Ms. Akbar, wife of MAS director Bilal Kaleem, really has been installed as the Muslim chaplain at Wellesley. While Ms. Akbar is an accomplished professional, the "hiring" process at Wellesley appears to have been quite secretive. It looks like something of an inside job placement. Well, you've got to plan your work and work your plan, and the US branch of the Muslim Brotherhood is working its plan pretty well.
Finally, Solomonia noticed that reporter Michael Paulsen's blogpost about the article reveals that the ISB is going to broadcast the call to prayer outside the mosque ("only during the day, out of respect to the neighbors." As Solomonia documents, this is in direct contradiction to statements made by two previous ISB spokesmen, Salma Kazmi and Jessica Masse, both of whom said that the ISB was not going to broadcast the call to prayer. Are we surprised?
How many times does the ISB/MAS have to lie about its intentions, its trustees, its funding, before Mayor Menino and the Boston Globe notice?
September 18, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
I'm hearing that Nancy Khalil will no longer be the Muslim Chaplain at Wellesley College. I'm further hearing that Najiba Akbar is slated to walk into that position, with no open announcement or competition for for job. That's a little odd, innit?
Phyllis Chesler raised a few questions about the former Muslim chaplain here last October. Ms. Khalil was known as a big proponent of hijab. According to several Wellesley Muslim students, there was strong peer pressure in the Wellesley Muslim student group to wear headscarves and cover up. Otherwise, you were not considered a “real Muslim.” Another student reported being told "not to run and not to laugh too loudly" at an Al-Muslimat weekend retreat. At Wellesley, Hillary Clinton's college, imagine a woman being told this! The former Wellesley chaplain routinely took her students to the ISB mosque and she studied under the ISB's imam Basyouny Nehela. Will the next Muslim chaplain also be an advocate for the ISB?
Najiba Akbar (seen in this photo) is reportedly married to Bilal Kaleem, the Executive Director of MAS Boston. As I've mentioned before, the Islamic Society of Boston and the Muslim American Society are esentially the same organization, sharing funding, directors and office space. The ISB/MAS organization works hard to establish itself as the voice of Massachusetts Muslims. But not all Muslims are happy about the "Muslim mafia" and their monopoly on leadership in local Islamic organizations. If it's true that Ms. Akbar is going to simply assume a vacant chaplain position at Wellesley College, then it appears that the ISB/MAS is further spreading their tentacles, putting their people in positions of power at prestigious local colleges. Is this some sort of dynasty?
Why woulnd't Wellesley publicize this position in the open job market? Why wouldn't the MAS/ISB send out an e-mail announcement of this vacancy at Wellesley? They send out job openings - both religious and secular - all the time, but I've not heard a peep about the vacancy at Wellesley. Is Ms. Akbar the most qualified person for this position? Why doesn't the college advertise and have an open competition? Who funds that position? Are there requirements for a transparent hiring process - with equal opportunity for all - in hiring chaplains at Wellesley?
September 04, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (1)
UPDATE BELOW
Eleanor Duckwall poses this question and links to Daniel Pipes' blog post on the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB). The latest entry has pics of a mural of the mosque being painted at the MBTA Roxbury Crossing station.
"July 24, 2008 update: A reader, the producer of L'Afrique (lafrique.com), was surprised to see that the Roxbury Crossing station of the Boston area subway system sports a painting of the nearby Islamic Society of Boston mosque and other Islamic themes. He sent me pictures of the still-unfinished mural and its surroundings, one of which I reproduce here. (For the others, click here, here, here, here, and here)."
![]()
"Comment: As the photographer points out, the Boston public transportation system does not sport crosses, stars of David, or other religious insignia. How did this exception come about? One hopes that Bostonians are not so beat down by ISB litigiousness that they have lost all curiosity about that institution's activities."
I vaguely recall the interior of the Copley Square T station (on the Green line) having a stylized silhouette of the Copley Trinity church, and the Kenmore T station had (still has?) references to Fenway Park (also sihouettes, strike signs, etc.). Having such references inside the subway stations gives a distinct sense of place to each station and alerts riders to what station they're in. But a detailed mural on the outside of a T station seems to be doing something else. When the mosque is right there in front of you, why paint a mural depicting it? I find it odd, and I tend to agree with Eleanor that someone's marking their turf.
I'll try to find out how this mural came to be, who designed it, etc. I didn't find anything on the MBTA website about this. You'd think the MBTA's website would have a page about the artwork at each station, but no such luck. If anyone has the scoop on the mosque mural at Roxbury Crossing, please contact me at misskelly99@gmail.com.
I hope the mural isn't part of the "services in the public interest" that the ISB is providing to the City in exchange for the BRA property. As you recall, BRA Parcel R-14 in Roxbury had a fair market value of $2 million according to the BRA, although the BRA later reduced that figure to $400K. The BRA transferred the property to the ISB for $175K in cash and $225K in "services in the public interest," including an Islamic law library at Roxbury Community College (RCC), lectures about Islam in Africa at RCC and maintenance of the local Clarence "Jeep" Jones park. We haven't heard a peep about these "public benefits", although the ISB has held several park cleanups.
Universal Hub also noticed the Pipes entry, and Adam G writes " I have no love for the the Jew-hating First Amendment deniers at the Islamic Society of Boston, but really, turf marking?" He asks, "Is this worth getting upset over?" No, but it's worth looking into.
UPDATE: False alarm? Molly provides some info in the comments below:
"All right then, if the painting of the mosque means that the Muslims are taking over, how do you explain the painting of the basilica on the other side of the post?"
"Seriously folks, not a single person has gone to look at it for yourselves, have you? The painting of the mosque is done so that a person looking at it will see the mosque in the background. On the other side, there's a painting of the Mission Church so that a person on that side will see the church in the background."
"I'm heading over to Mr. Pipes's site next, but sometimes a distinctive building is just a distinctive building."
"As for the design and execution, it's being done by a bunch of high schoolers. I think they're doing fine."
Thanks for the info, Molly.
July 27, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
UPDATE BELOW
What, no jail time for former Imam Muhammed Masood, despite the conviction for lying to federal agents?
The Boston Muslim American Society and the Islamic Council of New England are holding a "special Farewell Dinner" and fundraiser for Masood and his family tomorrow, July 26, 2008 (6 PM) at Ashur's Restaurant, behind the yet-to-be-finished Islamic Cultural Center in Roxbury.
According to the e-mail notice about this special dinner:
"Imam Masood will be leaving the US, with his family, on August 2nd, according to an agreement he has reached with his case. This event will go towards funding the travel expenses for 10 family members, and to support the family in their time in need. Funds will also go towards helping local Muslim immigrant families experiencing financial hardship."
What's so special about Masood? I bet Emadeddin Muntasser wished that the local MAS would have helped him out. I bet Martha Stewart and Marion Jones wished they could have avoided jail time for lying to federal agents. How does Masood escape jail time? Is there a different justice system for the brother of Hafiz Saeed?
You can make a financial donation at the MAS website here (select "Shaikh Masood Family Support" in the drop-down menu). The website says that "All donations to MAS Boston are tax deductible." Hmmm, here we go again. Is it really tax deductible to give money to a criminal who's essentially being deported from the U.S.?
Questions:
The MAS/ICB e-mail states that Masood and his family are leaving the country on August 2nd. Who is going to supervise Masood's three year probation that was part of his plea agreement?
Masood, with his criminal convictions, gets to board a plane and skedaddle out of here. What's going on here? Is this simply the most expedient way to deport Masood and his family? If that's the case, I'm OK with that. I don't see the need for my tax dollars to support these folks in jail and subsidize their dawah there. Fine, let them all leave now.
I welcome any legal minds out there to shed some light on this.
Previous postings on the Muhammed Masood/Abdul Hannan case here (scroll down).
UPDATE: Hmmm, now why would the MAS send out an e-mail dated Tuesday, July 22nd, announcing that Masood and his family are leaving on August 2nd, when Masood's sentencing has been postponed from August 1 to September 26th, 2008? The motion for continuance of the sentencing was filed on July 22nd, and granted on July 23rd (masood_sept_08_continuance.pdf ). Maybe they're not going anywhere for a while after all. Such a strange case this has been.
July 25, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (1)
A little birdie tells me that Sheihk Basyouny M. Nehela, imam of the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB), is seeking American citizenship. There's a hearing on Monday, May 19th, which the Sheikh is reportedly trying to move from immigration court to citizenship court. I have to admit I'm not keen on granting American citizenship to this man. There's something not quite right about Mr. Nehela (on the left below). He's a mystery man. In his ten years here, he's assumed a controlling position in virtually
every Islamic organization in the greater Boston area. Yet there's very little information available about his background. Why is his background such a big secret? Who brought Nehela here back in 1996? Nehela has been associated with Ikwhan, the Muslim Brotherhood, as I describe below. Are there other affiliations we should be concerned about? Is the judge who decides whether Nehela can stay here and become an American citizen going to thoroughly scrutinize this man? It would be a wise thing to do. American citizenship is too precious to give to someone whose allegiance might be to an outside power, not to our country, our government and our way of life. American citizenship requires taking an oath to uphold the U.S. constitution. Can Nehela do that? If he does, is he telling the truth?
Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was mocked for making the following statements, even though it's a good approach to any problematic situation:
"There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know."
And these "unknown unknowns" are the things that can really bite us in the butt. We're unprepared for them, we don't see them coming.
With Sheikh Nehela, the "known knowns" are what Nehela is doing in the Boston area now, where he has many roles as imam, teacher, director and advisor, as I've discussed here and here in earlier posts. His roles are:
Busy guy! When does he have time to sleep and spend time with his family? There are three other possible "known knowns" that were reported to me. I have been unable to independently confirm these claims, but I put them out, hoping that someone else can either confirm or refute them:
The "known unknowns" are what Nehela did in Egypt before he came here. There's no information published anywhere about his background except for his education at Al-Azhar University in Egypt, the oldest and most prestigious Islamic university in the world. The basic program of studies was, and still is, Islamic law, theology, and the Arabic language. Nehela's degree is in da'wah, or bringing people to Islam. But we don't know if Nehela ever worked as an imam anywhere else before coming to Boston. (One wonders what he put on his visa when he first came here to do Traweeh during Ramadan....don't you have to be an imam before you can work here as an imam?) There's no resume available on Nehela, which is unusual. Another "known unknown" is who Nehela's spiritual adviser was back in Egypt or is now (possibly Yusuf Qaradawi?). We don't know what denomination of Islam he is, which is usually one of the first things a Muslim will tell you about himself. Is Sheikh Nehela a Sunni or Shia, Salafi, Wahabi, Sufi, Akhwan, Deobandi, Ismaili or Ahmedi? Something else altogether? Why is that kept secret?
The last category is the "unknown unknowns," which are, of course, hard to anticipate. But I do wonder how it is Nehela came here in the first place, what was the connection, who was responsible? And how did Nehela escape unscathed by the ISB lawsuit saga? Several ISB officers and trustees were deposed and provided sworn statements. Nehela was subpoenaed, but he objected to the subpoenas long enough to avoid being questioned. The lawsuit was withdrawn just before he was finally going to be deposed. Was that a factor in the withdrawal of the lawsuit, what Nehela knows? Are there unseen hands back in Saudi Arabia or Egypt that are directing things at the ISB in Massachusetts? Who are those folks?
I'd recommend that any judge making a determination of whether Nehela can stay here and become a citizen think about Nehela's links to questionable people and a questionable ideology (Ikwhan). Maybe the judge can think about whether having Nehela and the ISB (with their Arabic culture) monopolize all the area Islamic organizations is a good thing. And I hope the judge considers the "unknown unknowns" about Mr. Nehela, before they bite us in the butt.
More questions were posed for Sheikh Nehela at this blog about a year ago. We never did hear back on any of those questions.
May 16, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (1)
Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) in the news again in the U.S., as the conviction of a Maryland man for supporting the terrrorist group LeT was recently upheld. Hafiz Saeed, the founder of LeT, is named in the article. Given that Hafiz Saeed had so many family members who were (and still are) imams in Massachusetts, has the government looked into LeT financing and support in Massachusetts mosques? It has been reported (anonymously) to Miss Kelly that an imam of the Islamic Society of Boston used to introduce Saeed's brother Muhammed Masood as a Jihadi fighter who used to fight in Kashmir before he (Masood) came to the U.S. This was reportedly said at lectures at the Cambridge mosque in 1998 and 1999. Have we really thoroughly investigated connections to Hafiz Saeed and LeT in our country?
"A former teacher at a Muslim school in Maryland was again sentenced to 15 years in prison Friday for providing support to a Pakistani terrorist group, even though a federal appeals court had ordered the trial judge to reconsider the original sentence."
"....(Ali Asad) Chandia, who taught third grade at the al-Huda school in College Park, Md., was convicted in 2006 of providing military support to Lashkar-e-Taiba, a militant group in Pakistan that violently opposes Indian rule of the disputed Kashmir territory."
As reported in India Express, the LeT is "accused of operating several militant training camps in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and linked to Al Qaeda, was founded by Pakistan-based Islamist leader Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, who has vowed to separate Jammu and Kashmir from India." You can read my previous postings about Hafiz Saeed here and here (the Masood/Hannan immigration arrest).
"....Specifically, Chandia was found guilty of acting as a driver and assistant to Lashkar leader Mohammed Ajmal Khan on his visits to the U.S. in 2002 and 2003 and helping Khan ship 50,000 paintball pellets from the U.S. to Pakistan."
Question: Did Lashkar leader Mohammed Ajmal Khan visit any Massachusetts mosques in 2002 and 2003?
Mr. Khan is currently serving nine years in prison in England. Mr. Chandia was accused of visiting LeT's headquarters in Lahore, Pakistan in November 2001 through February 2002; picking up Khan at Reagan International Airport in February 2002; helping Khan deliver 21 boxes of paintballs and other goods from Chandia's house to be sent to Pakistan; and allowing Khan to use his computer to buy unmanned aerial vehicles, night vision equipment, wireless video cameras and $17K worth of Kevlar antiballistic material.
Still think Chandia was being "unfairly targeted"?
April 28, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
I received a comment today on the blog post about the Roxbury mosque documentary. This person has many concerns and questions about the new mosque and apparently, with the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) and its imam, Basyouny Nehela (if I'm correctly reading between the lines). The comment in its entirety:
"There is a large Muslim community in Boston. Majority of them are trying to live their life under the law of the land (as the Muslim Prophet,PBH, has asked the Muslims to do when they go to a different land)."
"This Muslim community has to build places of worship. The question that needs answer is not that some red bricks soared to the sky and the result looks like a Middle Eastern Mosque but what "ideology" will flow through there? Is it the 'ideology' subscribed to by the Majority of the Muslims in the Boston area or in some stealth way leadership was imposed on the community (and by foreign money involvement also)?"
Continue reading ""Oh Grand Builders, What is Your Denomination?"" »
April 16, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I was tempted to attend the screening last week of In Good Faith, the Building of a Mosque and a Community, a "documentary" by Boston College student Matthew Porter, '09. But Camille Paglia was at Harvard the same night, and Camille won out for me. Solomonia went to the screening though and gives his two cents here.
According to Sol, although Porter calls himself a journalist, the documentary (mockumentary?) was anything but even-handed. The Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) comes off as the good guys, Citizens for Peace and Tolerance (CPT) comes off as the bad guys. BC professor Hale of CPT was portrayed negatively because he didn't "engage in dialogue" with the ISB.
Hmmm, did the ISB "engage in dialogue" before suing Professor Hale and sixteen other people, media companies and citizens groups? No, no they did not. As Sol says, the film's treatment of BC professor Hale is worse than shameful:
April 16, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
* * * * *